Singapore-based financial blog that aims to educate people on personal finance, investments, retirement and their Central Provident Fund (CPF) matters.

Monday, 31 October 2016

Invest & Prosper 2017

Invest and Prosper 2017 
by
ShareInvestors

Join us and listen from industry experts on their take about the investment environment for year 2017!
The panel of speakers includes:
Terence Tan - Chief Investment Strategist of Giants Learning Technologies
Song Seng Wun - Director/Economist of CIMB Private Banking
Geoff Howie - Market Strategist of Singapore Exchange
Kelvin Wong - Chief Technical Strategist of Asia City Index

Event Details:
Date: 5th November 2016
Location: SPH News Centre Auditorium
Time: 9.30AM - 5.00PM (Registration starts at 9.00AM)
Price: $8 (enjoy $2 off when you sign up with the promocode 'investmentstab'. U.P. $10)
Bento lunch is provided for the event!

Click HERE to sign up for the event!

Hurry now! Limited seats only!

We're got 5 FREE TICKETS for our readers!
Check out our Facebook Page for the instructions on winning these tickets!

But rather than rely on luck, why now sign up for the event now!

Saturday, 29 October 2016

What to Invest Going into 2017?

As we come near to the end of 2016, we should start questioning our investment strategy for next year. Some of the questions you should be thinking about are below:

1) What to invest in ahead of the US election on November 8?
2) How to position my portfolio for the US election and post-US election?
3) What to invest in if Hillary Clinton wins?
4) What to invest in if Donald Trump wins?
5) What to invest in Singapore for the year 2017?

If any one of these questions is one of your concern, is it time for you to join the following seminar and listen to some of the financial industry's experts about their views for 2017!

Invest & Prosper 2017

Join us and listen from industry experts on their take about the investment environment for year 2017!
The panel of speakers includes:
Terence Tan - Chief Investment Strategist of Giants Learning Technologies
Song Seng Wun - Director/Economist of CIMB Private Banking
Geoff Howie - Market Strategist of Singapore Exchange
Kelvin Wong - Chief Technical Strategist of Asia City Index

Event Details:
Date: 5th November 2016
Location: SPH News Centre Auditorium
Time: 9.30AM - 5.00PM (Registration starts at 9.00AM)
Price: $8 (enjoy $2 off when you sign up with the promocode 'investmentstab'. U.P. $10)
Bento lunch is provided for the event!

Click HERE to sign up for the event!

Hurry now! Limited seats only!

We've got 5 FREE TICKETS for our readers!
Check out our Facebook Page for the instructions on winning these tickets!

But rather than rely on luck, why now sign up for the event now!

Thursday, 13 October 2016

Are you Over-Insured by $46,000?!

Yup, you read it correctly - You might be over-insured by $46,000!
Most Singaporeans with CPF are automatically enrolled under the Dependents Protection Scheme (DPS).
Visit your CPF account online to check if you are currently over-insured by $46,000!
You can reduce your coverage if you are.

Recommended Post: 6 Singapore Public Transport Tips

The DPS is a Life Insurance + Terminal Illness Insurance + Total Disability Insurance.
It ensures you until you reach age 60.
The premiums are paid via your CPF account (Ordinary Account or Special Account).
Age (as of last birthday) Yearly Premiums
34 years & below $36
35 - 39 $48
40 - 44 $84
45 - 49 $144
50 - 54 $228
55 - 59 $260

By reducing your coverage by $46,000, you could potentially be saving between $75-$100 annually on your insurance premiums. That is actually a pretty significant sum you can use for other purposes like going out for a nice meal!

Singaporeans tend to face the issue of being over-insured or under-insured.
We hope that this article can help make you better insured!
For more information on DPS, click HERE to visit the official website!

Recommended Post: What are the Retirement Sums?

Remember to offer your opinions. If you don't put your two cents in, how can you expect to get change?

Have feedback? Tell us now!
Subscribe to us or
Follow us: Investment Stab on Facebook

Sunday, 9 October 2016

What is the Correct Retirement Mentality?


There has been a retirement debate going on on Straits Times' Forum Page.
The thread was started by one of our writers.
The first article can be found HERE.

There were feedbacks from the general public.
We have attached the articles regarding the different views HERE.
We would like to post a reply to the 'Second Thread', where our writer's letter to Straits Times was not published.
We think these views are important, and we hope to share these views with our readers and get more people to discuss these issues!

Letter:
I would like to thank Mr Lawrence Koh (‘Retirement is both a privilege and an entitlement’, 7 September) and Mr. Paul Chan ('Don’t miss out on life’s best chapter’, 7 September) for their views on my previous letter (‘Retirement not an entitlement’, 3 September).

Both men agreed that retirement is an important aspect of our lives and we should not simply spend our whole life working without enjoying the fruits of our labour. I fully agree with that statement. I am not against retirement, neither am I for working forever. I am just against the idea of forcefully going into retirement because ‘I have reached my retirement age’.

Ideally, we should have sufficient savings or retirement income (investments or CPF) to tide us over the rest of our lives. If we really cannot afford to retire at age 62 (due to financial concern), do we still forcefully go into retirement because it is part and parcel of life and because ‘I have earned it by working 40 over years’?

My concern is the mindset that we might have, the concept that ‘I have worked all my life, I deserve to retire at this age (62). If I can’t make ends meet, I should get financial support from the government.’ This is a very toxic mindset because it is what that is causing governments from around the world to run into insolvency or potential insolvency.

Majority of the people fall into the category of a direct correlation between personal effort and monetary rewards. I am not against the minority of people who receive financial aid. But when a large percentage of people starts to receive such levels of financial aid, the question becomes: “is this a financial aid for the lower bracket or has this become a free-for-all package.” The last point is particularly important because free-for-all package is essentially what many democratic countries have done and subsequently bankrupt their countries’ coffers.

If we worked all our lives, we are sure to lose out on life’s best chapter. But if we fail to secure enough for our retirement, I do not think an inadequately funded retirement can make the best out of that phase either.

-End of Letter.

Recommended Post: 6 Singapore Public Transport Tips

Remember to offer your opinions. If you don't put your two cents in, how can you expect to get change?

Have feedback? Tell us now!
Subscribe to us or
Follow us: Investment Stab on Facebook

Friday, 30 September 2016

Your summary to what's going on in Deutsche Bank: 5x Lehman Brothers crisis

If you haven't been aware of how the STI has been performing, it has dropped 1% before steadily climbing up in the late afternoon today. So what's going on that is causing all the fear and volatility? While fear of Deutsche Bank collapsing has been lingering for months, it seems that it has escalated higher where some hedge funds are starting to withdraw their accounts. This is essentially a bank run on a small scale, much similar to the one in 2008 where institutions stopped trading with affected parties due to counterparty risks. Well, before you start withdrawing all your cash positions from Deutsche Bank, here's how it works.

1. If a bank run really happens on Deutsche Bank or if it does go bankrupt, its underlying liabilities and trading exposures will negatively affect the ENTIRE FINANCIAL WORLD.

2. Since banks deal with each other in multiple ways, the results could be catastrophic, dragging multiple parties with it. For Deutsche Bank, where their derivative exposure is 5x the exposure that Lehman had, the impact could be drastically more than just 5x, due to the multiplier effect.

Recommended Post: 6 Singapore Public Transport Tips

3. Given the post-Lehman crisis, there are more factors to consider, aided with historical data. Politically, it has been damaging to the current government party as they are faced with 2 lousy choices: Bail-out with the taxpayers' money and suffer a massive drop in voters' ratings, or let the bank fail AND suffer a massive drop in voters' ratings WITH a massive financial crisis.

Even if a bank run does not occur, liquidity risks are going to kill the bank. With mounting concerns of its counterparty risks, Deutsche Bank could have its credit lines cut off, leading to its downfall sooner or later.

While all these are playing out, it is definitely consoling to see that the CEO of Deutsche Bank has done an excellent job in deleveraging, essentially reducing the counterparty exposure of the bank with others. The move to deleverage is widely accepted, hence, the lack of negative news that Deutsche Bank will collapse. This could help to minimize the impact of a meltdown, but let's be honest, a slap to the face would not be much different from a kick to the groin.

The main catalyst for STI's 1% drop? The federal's decision to charge Deutsche Bank with a $14 billion fine due to its involvement in the mortgage-backed securities spectacle. Many fear that the bank might not have enough to pay this fine.


However, I feel that it is likely the "feds" are going to mitigate the impact of the fine, perhaps reducing the quantum or collecting it in other means. The only solution, in my opinion, could be to have the investors or government to step in and raise capital for the bank, which in this case, is particularly damaging to existing shareholders as they have to dilute their shareholdings in the bank. These funds could act as a buffer and "raise" confidence, in hopes of eliminating the growing counterparty risks of Deutsche Bank.

All these bad news are thus hurting the global markets but gold, a safe haven commodity, has been surging and benefiting from all these negativity.

Share and tell us some of your opinions on the above. Remember to offer your opinions. If you don't put your two cents in, how can you expect to get change?

Have feedback? Tell us now! 

Subscribe to us or 

Thursday, 29 September 2016

Straits Times Forum Retirement Articles Thread

There has been a retirement debate going on in the Straits Times' Forum Page.
The thread was started by one of our writers.
We have collated the list of articles/letters that we think you should read, learn and know about!
Tell us what you think: Should Retirement is an Entitlement or is it a Privilege?

Recommended Post: 6 Singapore Public Transport Tips

First Post/Thread:
Retirement is not an Entitlement

Second Thread: Replies on the First Post:
Retirement is both a Privilege and an Entitlement
Ageism Prevents Seniors from Continuing to Work
Don't Miss Out on Life's Best Chapter

Third Thread: Replies on the Second Thread:
Introduce Shorter Work Shifts for Seniors
Extend Helping Hand, Not Handouts, to Retirees

Fourth Thread: Replies on the Third Thread:
State Support for Retirement is about Meeting Basic Needs
Role Model for State-Sponsored Retirement Exists

Fifth Thread: Replies on the Fourth Thread:
Meritocratic Society Must Retain Human Touch

Remember to offer your opinions. If you don't put your two cents in, how can you expect to get change?

Have feedback? Tell us now!
Subscribe to us or
Follow us: Investment Stab on Facebook



Saturday, 17 September 2016

What we know about risk is all wrong

The chance that an investment's actual return will be different than expected. Risk includes the possibility of losing some or all of the original investment. Different versions of risk are usually measured by calculating the standard deviation of the historical returns or average returns of a specific investment. A high standard deviation indicates a high degree of risk.

Read more: Risk Definition | Investopedia https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/risk.asp#ixzz3qE2I9SPs
Follow us: Investopedia on Facebook

As you can see from the above, Investopedia defines clearly what risk is. Schools preach on what risk is, how it is calculated and how it is quantified. But after reading this book, I am questioning the method that we were taught.

Recommended Post: Singapore Finance Minister on Personal Finance Part 2

The book I am recommending today: The Most Important Thing: Uncommon Sense for the Thoughtful Investor by Howard Marks.
Honestly, from just skimming through the content page and back cover recommendations, this book looks like any other investment and finance book which "sells" you on conventional knowledge offered in many other books. However, what it presents is a wealth of knowledge that average investors do not note. An example of such is the following definition of risk, defined by the author himself, Howard Marks.

However, what Howard Marks came out with, was this diagram above. While the general theory of higher risks equates to higher returns, he adds in 1 more variable into this consideration. The higher the risks, the higher the median of each rate of return and the greater deviation of the possible rate of return.

This basically means the higher your risks, the higher the chances of your expected rate of return fluctuates.

Recommended Post: Thoughts on the Government Audits

I came to realise the significance of this after taking a while to digest but I feel that it is something important to account for and not just taking unnecessary risks without accounting the consequences of it.

Share and tell us some of your opinions on the above. Remember to offer your opinions. If you don't put your two cents in, how can you expect to get change?

Have feedback? Tell us now! 

Subscribe to us or